Are definitions possible? More Calvin-ist reflections

No definitions

i got this comic strip, but i couldn’t add what i wanted to say. will do so when i have time. i will therefore keep adding my thoughts to this post, as and when I do have the time. i must say that i will be focussing upon definitions from within the postmodern predicament.

However, to start off… here is one link, to an article about the emerging vs fundamental church; which draws attention to the problem of definitions. (click the link for the article)

Another link; this time from the “philosophy of language” entry in Wikipedia. To supplement, here’s the “philosophy of language” entry from The Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy. And here’s the entry from the London Philosophy Study Guide. 


0 Responses to “Are definitions possible? More Calvin-ist reflections”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


My Archives

Passage for this Season

Philippians 2:11-13 (NIV) (12)Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, (13)for it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose.

%d bloggers like this: